Then why do notThe reason mentioned spontaneously is time

The President of the Republic has recognized that it should not have let her son apply to the Presidency of the Epad. Seen from the outside, blindness demonstrated in this matter leaves thoughtfully and led to wonder about the effects of a certain mode of leadership.

The portrait of the leader typically represents a stated figure who provides solutions, defends the interests of its teams and carries high the colours of the company. By contrast, it irony readily on a head which request the opinion of his entourage, seems reluctant to decide, or even changes his mind after having decided. This man here is often seen at best as a political weather vane, at worst as a manager inconsistent.

In short, we prefer a leader which sets a cap and gets the membership, a man of charisma and determination to a man who asks questions. One of them - bright head of company - told me with humor recently: "I tried to ask my computer Manager, I've never managed."

This conception of the leader is based: arrived at this stage precisely because it was able to solve problems, make judgement and demonstrate an ability to impose himself as leader of men. However, the limit of this operation is known: it does not create collaboration and one bride expression.

Often, it gets consensus of facade, where relevant discussions are overshadowed. The most serious is clearly to waive use a sum of information and opinions to a good decision. Thus, as seen in the case of the son of the President, leading to persist in error. An effective leader is obviously one that is able to adopt one and other postures, policy at times, to listen to others. Everyone knows. Then why do not

The reason mentioned spontaneously is time. The leader does not have the time to listen to, sursollicité, it passes one topic to another by giving his instructions. No one is fooled by this pretext. The use of time is a reflection of his vision of priorities. The real reasons are to seek in the psychology of the leader.

In fact, two types of competing psychological traits can lead to the same behavior. On the one hand, the leader is so sure of its superiority with others there no doubt have reason. Listen to him impatient, because it has the feeling of having understood until the other has finished his sentence. The entourage gradually takes the habit to go in the direction of the head, including fast that any other attitude annoys and gradually excludes the first circle.

Conversely, the leader who doubt him excessively may seek to hide by taking him too, authoritarian positions. The question is not so much the decision it takes, but that person authorizes the questioning that he does feel not threatened in his authority.

In both cases, the result is the same, a functioning more turned on itself on the other, and necessarily large errors in the key. Attention to a vision of leadership at the former is primarily to dominate: by trying to be above, it is no longer in real subjects.